TN Family Court In Need of Reform

Change Accountability Reform Enforcement of Juvenile Courts and all who are associated with them.

cases

Instead, in a modification proceeding, the trial judge must find a material change in circumstances that is compelling enough to warrant the dramatic remedy of changed custody. See, Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-6-101(a); Woodard v. Woodard, 783 S.W.2d 188 (Tenn.App.1989); Dailey v. Dailey, 635 S.W.2d 391 (Tenn.App.1981). Moreover, the burden is on the non-custodial parent to prove changed circumstances.

        Musselman v. Acuff, 826 S.W.2d 920, 922 (Tenn.Ct.App.1991).

Blogged with the Flock Browser

June 8, 2009 - Posted by TN Momma06 | Family Court | , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

1 Comment »

  1. In my case I moved to several different locations since the birth of my 10 year old and the moving continued after school started. The dad moved the same number of times within Knoxville and then he relocated to VA where after school started he also moved 4-5 times subjecting my daughter to all of his different residences when she visited. However, the court only considered my moving since I was the custodial parent. There was never a request from the non custodian whom I never married or who never contributed more than minimal child support that I not move; he simply impregnated a woman and moved in with her in another state, and after they had their first of 3 children 7 months after the marriage; this couple was deemed more stable. They birthed 2 babies during the court proceedings to get custody of my daughter! The court did not take the interest to consider the best interest; simply listened to their own (attornies and GAL’s) and reacted in a knee-jerk fashion. The court required the case to drag out for 5 days when it appears that the decision was made prior to any of the testimony or regardless of the vindictiveness of the now custodial parent. They were willing to listen to a bias GAL even after the COURT said that her claims of D and N had no merit…she was allowed to ramble on and on further harming the mother without any reasoning, and a crooked attorney who I was told had the job of mkaing me, mom, look like dirt! This man also has a daughter…maybe he does not deserve custody of his daughter. I have about as much reason to beleive this as he did to slander me just so he could rake in the money. Mr. Kern even guarded the courtroom door while his client was locked in with the files during a court lunch break. This group works from the inside and they are corrupt and spineless.

    Comment by Cindy Brown | August 26, 2009


Leave a comment